Monday, August 24, 2009

We Hindus are a bit colorful in nature...

We Hindus are a bit colourful in nature. Sample some of the points below:

We have approximately 330 million Gods (and Goddesses). Yes the no is right; in fact the list keeps increasing because we also keep including our family Gurus in this list. So we see people worshipping Baba Ramdev, Yogdev, Somdev and so on and so forth. By the way, Hindu population is 885 million. So almost 1 God for every 2.5 Hindus…Now that’s called focussed attention.

Our Gods come in all shapes and sizes: Gods with 10 heads; Gods with 3 eyes; Gods with a trunk as their nose; Gods who resemble a monkey; Gods who have a river flowing out of their hairs and the list goes on. To top that, most of these Gods will have an animal as their rider. So we end up worshipping cows, snakes, peacocks, rats etc…

We have Gods for everything. So I have full choice. If I want wisdom, I goto one and if I want money, I goto another. In fact, we even have a God for love and Sex. Kamadeva is our own handsome Hindu love god. His attributes are quite similar to Cupid; difference being Cupid is not a God in Christianity. Kamadeva rides a parrot. By the way, he is supposedly son of Lakshmi who represents money (wow so there is a connection between love and money afterall)

Adding to the color, Hinduism as a religion have promoted alcohol (You don’t believe me …remember all the devtas used to have “madira” flowing through their parties). In fact that reminds me we also do not have any objections to “nach ganas”. So we read about beautiful females seducing Rishi munis in our “granthas”.

Ours might be the only religion where we have allowed polygamy and polyandry. (please refer to Arjuna having two wives and Draupdi having 5 husbands).

We also enjoy the “leelas” of Lord Krishna which is nothing but healthy flirting in modern terms.

We have multiple festivals. In fact going by the Hindu calendar, I might end up celebrating every day. While talking of this, no festival is complete without a proper show. So we see firecrackers, colors, “nautankis”, rakhis etc.

Our mythology has talked about every invention that has come in this era. So we see aeroplanes, modern weapons (brahmastra), “door drishti”, in our Ramayana and Mahabharta etc.

By the way, does anybody know who founded Hinduisum? For every religion, there is a founder but Hinduism as far as I could study doesn’t have any founder.

So what do you think…aren’t we a colourful race?

Monday, August 17, 2009

Shahrukh's detention at US airport

Recently, Shahrukh Khan was detained at Newark airport for approximately 2 hours. The problem, his name cropped up as a potential terrorist on US immigration system and hence taken to a separate room for questioning. This resulted in major hue and cry in India with condemnations coming in from all flavours of people ranging from bollywood celebrities to cricket stars to our 'beloved' politicians.

Our Information & Broadcasting minister Ambika Soni even suggested that India should do a 'tit-for-tat' towards Americans (And I always thought politicians are supposed to be diplomatic in matters pertaining to two countries)

Anyways I don’t want to debate on what happened there... I also feel it was inappropriate. 15 minutes of reasonable questioning / internet search would have eased the authorities anxiety on his indentity. This only highlights the inefficiencies in US immigration system. But my blog questions the justification of the reactions of us Indians post this issue.

My first comment on what happened: Let me put back an alternate scenario. Let’s say someone like Tom Hanks or Eddie Murphy lands here at Indian airports and face immigration enquiries by someone who is least interested in Hollywood movies. Their name crops up as a “suspect”. What do you think would have happened? Don't you think Indian authorities would have questioned them as well? Wouldn't the Indian officer complete all possible investigations and release them only after he is 100% sure that the person he is allowing inside India is definitely not a terrorist. Please note I am not even talking of celebrities from other countries like China, Europe etc... God knows if anyone would be able to recognize them.

Second thought on the reaction: Every year, thousands of people are questioned extensively at immigrations by US authorities. I know lot of my friends whose visa has been denied. Even in Bollywood, recently Kabir Khan and John Abraham were questioned extensively because of their trips to Afghanistan for their movie “Kabul Express”. I am sure all those who have travelled to US will agree that the authorities work on a “robotic” basis and are totally dependent on what steps their system suggests (I will reserve my personal experience of entering US for a later blog). Well no one raised issues then. Why is it that someone like Shahrukh Khan’s case has to prompt this kind of national ? Also does it justify a diplomatic channel to expect an apology?

Will end this blog with a question? Is it because we worship our celebrities to such an extent, that they are not considered as normal human beings and are a part of different league all together?